Russian FM Lavrov this week dismissed Team Trump’s floated peace proposals for Ukraine as unsatisfactory. Essentially, the Russian view is that the calls for a frozen conflict precisely miss the point: From the Russian perspective, such ideas -- frozen conflicts, ceasefires and peacekeepers -- do not begin to qualify as the type of treaty-based, ‘Big Picture’ deal the Russians have been advocating since 2021.
Without a sustainable, permanent end to conflict, the Russians will prefer to rely on a battlefield outcome --even at the high risk of their refusal bringing continuing escalatory -- even nuclear -- US brinkmanship.
The question rather is: Sustained peace between the US and Russia -- Is it even possible?
The death of former President Jimmy Carter recalls to us that the turbulent 1970s policy ‘revolution’ which became encapsulated in the writings of Zbig Brzezinski, Carter’s National Security Adviser -- a revolution that bedevils US-Russia relations from then, until today.
The Carter era saw a major inflection point with Brzezinski’s invention of weaponised identitarian conflict, and his espousal of the same identitarian tools -- as applied more widely -- in order to bring western societies under the control of a technocratic élite “[practicing] continuous surveillance over every citizen … [together with élite] manipulation of the behaviour and intellectual functioning of all people …”.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Conflicts Forum’s Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.