Conflicts Forum’s Substack

Conflicts Forum’s Substack

Share this post

Conflicts Forum’s Substack
Conflicts Forum’s Substack
Erdogan’s Idlib shock shadows ‘Kursk’

Erdogan’s Idlib shock shadows ‘Kursk’

Alastair Crooke, 5 Dec 2024

Conflicts Forum
Dec 05, 2024
∙ Paid
7

Share this post

Conflicts Forum’s Substack
Conflicts Forum’s Substack
Erdogan’s Idlib shock shadows ‘Kursk’
Share

‘Doomsters’ is an occasional Russian expression used to categorise commentators that only see the ‘dark side to events’ (a vice quite prevalent during the Soviet era). Marat Khairullin, a highly respected Russian military analyst, says, “Today, a network of mercenary war bloggers has begun another round of moaning - this time about Syria, where apparently everything is lost for Russia”.

“Many see the events in Syria (and some add Georgia to the mix) as attempts to open additional fronts against our country. Perhaps that’s true. But in that case, it’s more appropriate to draw direct parallels with the reckless attack on Kursk, which left the Ukrainian armed forces in an almost hopeless position”.

Khairullin views the activation of this jihadist insurgency in Syria as a similarly ‘desperate’ act. The background is that the Syria-Russia-Iran coalition had -- thorough the Astana negotiations -- “cornered the remaining Syrian terrorists into a 6,000 sq. km enclave. Without delving into the details, it was a process reminiscent of the [Ukrainian] Minsk Agreements—both sides were utterly exhausted and thus agreed to a ceasefire. Importantly, all sides understood this was only a temporary truce; the contradictions were so profound that no one expected the conflict to end”.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Conflicts Forum’s Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Conflicts Forum
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share